The Economist poll also found that over 70% of Republicans and Democrats surveyed supported requiring fully transparent redistricting efforts and many supported requiring public input on proposed maps.
Every 10 years, states are required to redraw electoral districts to account for population changes as determined by the U.S. census. This process is often highly partisan and done in a way to maximize the advantage of whichever party controls the state government. Gerrymandering is the term to describe when districts are drawn in a way to maximize the number of seats controlled by one party.
Analysis after the latest round of redistricting shows a decline in the overall competitiveness of electoral districts. In 2020, 44 districts were thought to be competitive races, now only 40 are considered competitive.
Recent polling by the Economist showed that there is bipartisan support for implementing measures to prevent gerrymandering. In fact, 63 percent of American adults supported the creation of non-partisan commissions that would create and approve district maps. According to the Economist, 60 percent of Democrats and Republicans favored this solution. Republicans and Democrats also supported banning lobbyists from participating in redistricting efforts.
The Economist poll also found that over 70 percent of Republicans and Democrats surveyed supported requiring fully transparent redistricting efforts and many supported requiring public input on proposed maps. A majority of Republicans 50 percent and Democrats 67 percent also supported Supreme Court intervention to prevent gerrymandering. Voters on both sides of the aisle support opportunities to create fair and representative elections.
READ NEXT
- Beyond Who Pays: The Healthcare System Voters Actually Want73% of voters say healthcare is expensive because too many organizations profit from its complexity — that’s a diagnosis of the system, not a complaint about spending.
- “Gestating Parent”: What Americans Think About New York’s Family-Law Language ChangeNew York replaced “mother” and “father” with “gestating parent” and “non-gestating parent” in family law. Most voters were unaware of the change, and once informed, they oppose it by over 3 to 1.
- “Completely Crazy”: The Voters Who Feel Strongly Enough to ActWhen 68% of voters call a policy completely crazy, that’s a turnout signal, not just a poll number. The same survey measured intensity, which shows which issues motivate voting.
- Wearable Health Devices Go Mainstream: Survey Reveals Strong Support for Patient-Controlled Health DataWearable health technology is becoming popular, rapidly changing healthcare as we know it.
- Democrat Lawmakers Are Taking Positions That Even Liberals Call CrazyMany positions favored by Democratic lawmakers are being rejected by large majorities of voters – including liberals.